Aethra Science Publishers - Academic Journals Platform

Selection of Reviewers

All manuscripts submitted to Aethra Science are peer-reviewed by members of the journals’ editorial board, expert reviewers, and the Editor-in-Chief. Only those manuscripts which successfully meet our quality requirements are published.

External reviewers are selected from different international databases of peer-reviewed scientific literature. Members of the editorial board and Aethra’s reviewer panel are also invited to share their expert opinions.

Peer Review Invitation

Manuscripts are evaluated initially by editors and subsequently by independent external reviewers to verify:

"Falls within the scope of the journal"

"Meets editorial criteria for originality and quality"

Aethra Science follows a double-blind peer review process where the identities of both the reviewer and author are kept undisclosed. Access to full-text manuscripts is provided via our online system.

Purpose & Ethics

Purpose of a Review

Review reports provide the EiC with expert opinions on manuscript quality and supply authors with explicit feedback to improve their papers for publication.

Selfless Peer Review

We aim for objective review free of self-interested bias. Reviewers must avoid self-promotion and ensure all citation requests are relevant to the submission.

Reviewers must avoid referencing their own or coworkers' publications unless relevant and approved.

How to Review

Reviewers are expected to rate manuscripts on points including:

Scientific significance and originality

Reproducibility of methodology

Compliance with ethical guidelines (Helsinki Declaration)

Adherence to Reporting Guidelines (CONSORT, PRISMA, etc.)

Quality of figures and illustrations

Adequacy of sample size

Comprehensive referencing

Generative AI Policy

Reviewers are strictly advised not to use AI technologies to generate review reports. This ensures the integrity and confidentiality of the scholarly record. We recommend following COPE Ethical Guidelines for quality, unbiased reports.

Confidentiality & Privileged Information

The peer-review process is completely confidential. Reviewers must not disclose any information whatsoever before publication.

"Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript should not be used in an editor's or reviewer’s own research without express written consent."

Review Time & Decisions

Review Timeline

Reports are expected within 2-4 weeks. Timely publication benefits both authors and the scientific community.

Editorial Decision

Authors usually have 15 days for revisions. Final decisions rest with the EiC based on reviewer recommendations.

Disputes & Recognition

Appeals against rejections must provide sound reasoning and evidence. Complaints on ethical practices are handled according to our academic misconduct guidelines.

Verify on Publons Transfer Facility

Become a Reviewer

Candidates must hold a Ph.D., have research experience in relevant areas, and a proven publication record.

Reviewer Registration Form

Workflow Overview